This post generated over 1220 comments in just a few days. Some of our favoritesā¦
āHigher up is a moron š šÆā
āI would clamp like the 2nd photo, I try to get it close to parallel as possible to maximize clamping surface area. However always bias toward second rather than first.ā
āThe 2nd photo is correct and I've always been told you also don't want the clamp level to slightly elevate the back higher than the front will push all the clamping force into the part.ā
āTop photo is a good example of a bad example and why people that know very little shouldn't be in a management position. The downfall of American industry.ā
āI was taught for it to level or a 1/32 higherā
āTop one can have the possibility of pushing the part and very low holding power as well as deformation of the edge of the part. Your heel should always be higher than surface clamping to make sure you only have downward pressure on the block directly underneath the clamp. Makes you wonder how some people make it to higher up positionsā
Are tooling reps doing more than they should? This weekās Morning Machinist breaks down what machinists are saying about reps getting pulled into programming, toolpath strategy, and more. Real talk from the shop floorādonāt miss it.